Throughout the trial, Don Harrison, Google’s head of worldwide partnerships, confirmed that Spotify paid a 0 % fee when customers opted to buy subscriptions by way of Spotify’s personal system. If customers selected Google as their fee processor, Spotify handed over 4 %, a big deviation from the usual 15 % payment.
Google’s Person Selection Billing program, initiated in 2022, reduces the Play Retailer fee by about 4 % for builders utilizing their fee system. This brings Google’s 15 % subscription service payment to round 11 %. Nevertheless, the precise price financial savings for builders are sometimes minimal, as they bear the fee processing bills.
Google fought to maintain Spotify’s numbers non-public throughout its antitrust battle with Epic, arguing that disclosing such particulars might impression negotiations with different app builders searching for extra favorable charges.
Harrison justified the distinctive take care of Spotify, citing the music streaming service’s “unprecedented” reputation as the rationale to strike a “bespoke” deal. He testified, “If we don’t have Spotify working seamlessly throughout Play companies and core companies, folks is not going to purchase Android telephones.”
In response to The Verge, Google acknowledged Harrison’s testimony in a press release. Spokesperson Dan Jackson defined, “A small variety of builders that make investments extra immediately in Android and Play could have completely different service charges as a part of a broader partnership that features substantial monetary investments and product integrations throughout completely different type elements.”
Google, nevertheless, didn’t disclose the names of different builders benefiting from extra favorable charges. Throughout the trial, it was revealed that Google provided Netflix a reduced fee of 10 %, which the streaming big declined.
Previously, Spotify has been vocal about its grievances with in-app buy charges. For instance, the Swedish firm just lately reiterated its opposition to Apple’s App Retailer insurance policies, accusing the Cupertino-based firm of unfair practices.